[![besample](https://besample.app/assets/Logo_1787745314285-DPNdsvrL.png)](https://besample.app/)

[Log In](https://researcher.besample.app/?l=1&p=login)

[←Research resources](https://besample.app/resources)

# 7 Best MTurk Alternatives for Researchers in 2026

By the Besample team

The main MTurk alternatives for researchers in 2026 are Besample, Connect by CloudResearch, Prolific, Toluna, Dynata, Qualtrics, and Cint. The best choice depends on geography, sample size, participant quality requirements, and study type.

Amazon Mechanical Turk is shutting down permanently on September 30, 2026. For researchers who have relied on MTurk to recruit online participants, the closure raises an obvious question: what are the best alternatives to MTurk for academic and behavioral research?

The answer depends heavily on what kind of research you are conducting. Today’s participant recruitment ecosystem is more specialized than it was when MTurk became popular with researchers. Some platforms focus on academic behavioral research, some provide access to global populations, some prioritize participant verification and data quality, and others offer enormous commercial research panels.

Below are seven major options researchers may want to consider.

**Disclosure:** This guide is published by Besample, one of the platforms included below. We have tried to make the comparison useful and factual, including situations in which another provider may be a better choice.

| Platform | Particularly strong for |
| --- | --- |
| Besample | Global and cross-cultural behavioral research |
| Connect by CloudResearch | General academic research and Western samples |
| Prolific | Verified participants and strong research-specific quality controls |
| Toluna | Large-scale global consumer and market research |
| Dynata | Large, targeted global panels and complex sampling |
| Qualtrics | Recruitment integrated with survey and research infrastructure |
| Cint | Global scale and access through a large panel marketplace |

## 1. [Besample](https://besample.app/?utm_source=bslp&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=mturk) — best for global and cross-cultural behavioral research

[Besample](https://besample.app/?utm_source=bslp&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=mturk) is a global research platform that helps researchers design and conduct behavioral studies across linguistic, cultural, and geographic contexts. The platform features a growing pool of over 60,000 participants across 16 countries: Argentina, Brazil, Egypt, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, South Africa, Turkey, and Ukraine.

Beyond participant recruitment, Besample supports the practical work of adapting research for different populations, including navigating language differences, cultural nuances, local response patterns, and country-specific sampling considerations.

Since September 2026, Besample has also offered panels in major Western markets, including the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, through its integration with [Connect by CloudResearch](https://www.cloudresearch.com/mturk-alternative/). This combination makes Besample particularly useful for cross-cultural and multi-country projects in which researchers want to collect Western and non-Western samples within the same workflow.

## 2. [Connect by CloudResearch](https://www.cloudresearch.com/mturk-alternative/) — best all-around option for academic research in Western populations

Connect by CloudResearch is one of the most natural successors to MTurk for behavioral scientists. CloudResearch itself grew out of the academic MTurk ecosystem and has extensive experience with the problems researchers encountered when using general-purpose crowdsourcing platforms for scientific research.

Connect provides a research-oriented participant pool, demographic targeting, participant approval information, and additional quality controls. It retains much of the flexibility that originally made MTurk attractive while providing infrastructure designed more explicitly around research.

For researchers primarily collecting data in the United States and other supported Western populations, Connect offers a strong combination of quality, flexibility, and cost.

**Best suited for:** general academic behavioral research, experiments and surveys, and researchers seeking Western samples.

**Consider another option if:** broad international coverage or difficult-to-reach non-Western populations are central to the research design.

## 3. [Prolific](https://www.prolific.com/) — best when participant verification and data quality are paramount

Prolific has become one of the best-known participant recruitment platforms in behavioral science and has built much of its reputation around research-specific participant quality.

The platform uses participant verification and quality-control systems and has invested particularly heavily in addressing a newer problem for online researchers: AI agents and automated respondents masquerading as human participants.

Prolific also offers extensive prescreening, longitudinal research functionality, and representative-sample options for selected populations.

For researchers whose target population is well represented in Prolific's participant pool, it can be an excellent choice when obtaining a clean, verified online sample is the overriding priority.

**Best suited for:** behavioral experiments, surveys, longitudinal studies, and projects where participant authenticity and research-specific quality controls are especially important.

**Consider another option if:** the research requires substantial coverage in countries where Prolific's participant pool is limited.

## 4. [Toluna](https://www.toluna.com/) — best for large-scale global consumer research

Toluna operates at a different scale and with a somewhat different orientation from research-specific platforms such as Prolific or Connect. It is a major global market-research and consumer-insights provider with access to participants across a large number of markets.

Its infrastructure is particularly useful for projects requiring substantial samples, consumer targeting, international coverage, or research conducted across many markets simultaneously.

For academic researchers, this can provide considerably greater scale than a typical behavioral-research participant community. The trade-off is that the experience and participant ecosystem are designed around the broader insights industry rather than specifically around academic behavioral experiments.

**Best suited for:** large international surveys, consumer research, multi-market studies, and projects requiring substantial global scale.

**Consider another option if:** the project is a relatively small behavioral experiment and research-specific participant infrastructure is more important than panel scale.

## 5. [Dynata](https://www.dynata.com/platform-services/dynata-plus/) — best for large and highly targeted global samples

Dynata is another major provider of first-party research data and global survey participants. Its scale and targeting capabilities make it particularly relevant for projects requiring large samples or specific demographic and consumer populations.

Unlike platforms built primarily as self-service marketplaces for academic researchers, Dynata sits within the professional market-research ecosystem and can support more complex sampling requirements and large international projects.

This can make Dynata especially valuable for researchers who need populations that would be difficult to recruit from a conventional academic participant pool.

**Best suited for:** large global studies, specialized demographic targeting, consumer research, and complex sampling requirements.

**Consider another option if:** simplicity, transparent self-service recruitment, or the workflow of a research-specific participant platform is the priority.

## 6. [Qualtrics](https://www.qualtrics.com/lp/survey-platform/) — best for combining recruitment with survey infrastructure

Most academic researchers know Qualtrics primarily as survey software, but Qualtrics also provides access to research participants and online samples.

The major advantage is integration. Researchers can combine survey design, participant recruitment, fielding, and other research services within the same broader ecosystem rather than coordinating separate survey and recruitment platforms.

Qualtrics can also support demographic and behavioral targeting and more managed approaches to sample recruitment.

**Best suited for:** survey research, representative or targeted samples, and researchers who want participant recruitment integrated with their existing Qualtrics workflow.

**Consider another option if:** the main priority is accessing a dedicated behavioral-research participant community or minimizing recruitment costs.

## 7. [Cint](https://www.cint.com/lp/market-research-made-simple/) — best for accessing a very large global panel marketplace

Cint differs from several of the platforms above because it operates a large research marketplace connecting sample buyers with numerous participant suppliers around the world.

That model provides substantial geographic reach and scale. Researchers can use Cint for multi-country surveys, demographic targeting, consumer research, and projects requiring samples that extend well beyond a single proprietary participant community.

The marketplace model also means researchers should understand how participants are sourced for a particular project and apply appropriate quality-control procedures—particularly for academic behavioral research where provenance and participant experience may matter.

**Best suited for:** large-scale international surveys, multi-market research, consumer samples, and projects where geographic reach and scale are major requirements.

**Consider another option if:** having a single, research-specific participant community is important to the study design.

## Which MTurk alternative should researchers choose?

There is no universal replacement for MTurk. Researchers conducting cross-cultural or global behavioral research may find Besample particularly useful. Researchers primarily seeking Western academic samples may prefer Connect. Those prioritizing participant verification and research-specific quality controls may gravitate toward Prolific. Researchers who need very large international or consumer samples should also consider Toluna, Dynata, or Cint, while Qualtrics can be particularly convenient when recruitment needs to sit within a broader survey-research workflow.

So rather than asking simply, “What platform replaces MTurk?”, it may be more useful to ask: What participant source best matches the population, methodology, scale, and quality requirements of this particular study? That is the question researchers now have considerably more options to answer.

![besample](https://besample.app/assets/Group_2_1788175605408-CunusH0B.svg)

© 2026 All rights reserved

---
Source: https://besample.app/resources/mturk-alternatives/